There are so many sports that are not included in the Olympics, it’s absolutely good. However, some of these sports should be added to the list, and cricket is one of those sports. There are so many rules that cricket cannot come up with at the Olympics, which is why sports are generally good.
Olympic sports have a set of eligibility criteria
For example, to qualify for summer games, men and women from at least 75 countries must be extensively trained. Similarly, international competitions are held every four years to determine which country will win each Olympic slot. In contrast, cricket does not have such an organizational structure. Many associates it with the former British colonies in South Asia, but cricket is as popular in Australia and Africa as any other sport, including rugby and American football.
Non-Olympic sports are rare
It is true that many Olympic sports have very high levels of training requirements, which can often be very expensive. If you do not meet these criteria, you will not be able to compete on a level playing field with other sports. However, many non-Olympic sports are less rigorous in terms of height or weight restrictions or how much money you can spend on equipment; You can even avoid wearing your own shoes if they are not new!
Ignores unpopular sportsmanship
Cricket is one of the most popular sports not in the Olympics. If you ask any cricket fan, they will tell you that it should be. For once, we agree with them! However, let’s take a step back and see why it is not there.
Does size matter?
Size is important, but not in every way. While cricket is now growing as a global sport, its growth is slowing. There are many reasons for this, but today I would like to focus on one of them: the lack of Olympic status in cricket. Let me tell you why I think that’s a good thing.
Of course, there are competing interests.
Currently, cricket and baseball are two common sports. They are both bat-and-ball games played between two teams and scored by a judge who can give one team runs or keep them away from another team. While they share some similarities, they also have big differences …
How do we see sports now?
This is not an accusation, it is a real question. What are your thoughts? Which sport should be included or excluded from an event such as the Olympic Games? Are there any current games you are considering removing from the lineup? From a very personal point of view, my own view is that cricket should not be played in the Olympic Games. After all, this is not a sport that everyone can compete in and enjoy – because of cost or space.
There is a good reason for not having cricket in the Olympics. This is not really a sport like athletics. While this certainly requires endurance, strength, and agility, it places more emphasis on strategic planning than many other sports. This does not mean that cricketers are not athletes, instead, there are many sports with Olympic slots that fit well into a similar category. Many of these are characterized by speed and endurance.